|
EOSINOPHILIC
KERATOCONJUNCTIVITIS IN A CAT
History
A
four year old, male neutered, common domestic short haired cat presented
seeking a second opinion having had an ongoing corneal lesion in
its left eye for 6 months. It was originally believed to have been
a scratch on the cornea and enucleation had been recommended due
to its progressive nature.
Examination
A
full clinical examination was undertaken along with an ophthalmic
examination as per Appendix 1. All relevant findings are recorded
below.
OU: - PLR, indirect and direct - brisk and normal
- Menace normal
-
Lids unremarkable
-
Fundic examination unremarkable
OD:
- Ocular examination unremarkable
OS:
- Cornea - a fleshy, irregular area filling the dorsolateral corneal
quadrant, with a white, gritty surface plaque. This was protuberant
from the corneal surface and extended over the limbus into the adjacent
conjunctiva which was hyperaemic. Sparse neovascularisation was
present with a rim of corneal oedema (fig. 24).
-
Mild conjunctivitis including the third eyelid
-
Mild blepharospasm with serous ocular discharge
- Fluorescein dye retention negative.
STT L=12mm/minute, R=14mm/minute
A
corneal scrape was taken for cytology.
Diagnosis
A
diagnosis of eosinophilic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) was made based
on clinical appearance and confirmed by cytology.
Cytology
Report (Idexx Laboratories)
A
single submitted air dried smear indicated to be from the cornea
contains a few squames and squamous epithelial cells. There are
eosinophils present. No infectious agents are seen.
Comment
- The cytological preparation is of low cellularity but the features
are consistant with slight eosinophilic inflammation. The primary
consideration should be eosiniphilic proliferative keratoconjunctivitis.
Treatment for this condition, with continued monitoring, is recommended.
Treatment
Carbomer
980 (Viscotears, Novartis AG) TID OU
Prednisolone
acetate 1% solution (Pred Forte, Allergan) QID OS
Follow
up
10 days later - 80% resolution of the lesion (fig. 25)
- STT L= 18 mm/min, R= 19 mm/min
-
Due to the improvement in the STT values the ocular lubrication
was stopped 30 days later
- The lesion had continued to improve however there was a persistent
opaque area but this was no longer fleshy in character (fig. 26)
- STT L=19mm/min, R=21mm/min
-
The cat was becoming intolerant to application of topical medication
so a change of medication route was necessary for 100% resolution.
-
Megestrol acetate (Ovarid, Novartis AG) started, at 2.5 mg q72hrs
PO
30
days later - 100% resolution of the corneal lesion (fig. 27).
All
treatment ceased.
Update
A
minor recurrence occurred at the same site 2 years later. This was
treated with prednisolone acetate 1% QID and resolved within 3 weeks.
Discussion
Eosinophilic
keratoconjunctivitis is a poorly understood condition that is seen
uncommonly in cats and even more rarely in horses. It has been suggested
that it may be associated with UV light exposure, being more common
in cats living at altitude (1). It has also been shown that cats
with EKC have a much higher incidence of Feline Herpes Virus (FHV-1)
(76.3%) compared with ophthalmologically normal cats (5.9%) (2).
This strongly suggests that FHV-1 is involved in the aetiology of
this condition. FHV-1 does not normally induce an eosinophilic inflammatory
response within the cornea so the pathogenesis of the condition
remains uncertain.
This
is a slowly progressive and usually unilateral disease at first
but will affect both eyes if left untreated. Initially this condition
presents as corneal oedema with neovascularisation. Signs of pain
or ocular discharge, which would usually be expected to accompany
such corneal changes, are very variable. It has a typical site of
occurrence at the dorsal temporal or dorsal nasal limbus but can
occur anywhere around the limbal circumference (3).
The
granulation tissue and white plaque lesions are usually taken to
show evidence of chronicity. The white plaques are formed from degenerate
cells and nuclear debris with amorphous eosinophilic material. There
is eosinophilic stromal infiltrate on histological examination with
a chronic granulomatous inflammatory reaction. Demonstrating eosinophils
on corneal scrape or biopsy is therefore diagnostic, especially
with the typical clinical signs (4). The histology is similar to
the lesions seen with feline eosinophilic granuloma complex however
no link has been established between skin lesions and ocular lesions.
Historically
megestrol acetate was given as a very effective treatment for this
condition but due to concerns about its safety, especially long
term, its use is now discouraged. Its use can precipitate iatrogenic
Addison's disease, pyometra and diabetes mellitus (5). Topical prednisolone
is now taken to be the treatment of choice. Megestrol acetate was
used in this case to resolve the last recalcitrant remnants of the
disease once the cat had become intolerant of topical treatment.
Megestrol acetate has the benefit of being in a very palatable base
and therefore easy to give to cats.
Recurrence can occur, as in this case, however rapid recognition
allowed early treatment and resolution. Ongoing monitoring of these
animals is warranted to prevent establishment of a chronic lesion.
Recurrence of these lesions may help support an FHV-1 associated
aetiology as it is well documented that FHV-1 latency may occur.
References
1.
Slatter D (2001) Fundamentals of Veterinary Ophthalmology 3rd ed.
WB Saunders, 288-290.
2.
Nasisse MP, Glover TL, Moore CP, Weigler BJ (1998) Detection of
feline herpesvirus 1 DNA in corneas of cats with eosinophilic keratitis
or corneal sequestration. American Journal of Veterinary Research
July 59 (7) 856-858.
3.
Paulsen M, Lavach JD, Severin G, Eichenbaum J (1987) Feline Eosinophilic
Keratitis: A Review of 15 Clinical Cases. Journal of the American
Animal Hospital Association 23 (63-69).
4.
Prasse KW, Winston SM (1996) Cytology and Histopathology of Feline
Eosinophilic Keratitis. Veterinary and Comparative Ophthalmology
Vol. 6, No 2, (74-81).
5.
Tennant B (1999) BSAVA Small Animal Formulary 3rd ed, BSAVA, 153.
Figure
24: On presentation.

Figure
25: Ten days into treatment.

Figure
26: Thirty days into treatment.

Figure
27: Lesion fully resolved, after sixty days of treatment.
|