|
EOSINOPHILIC KERATOCONJUNCTIVITIS IN A CAT
History
A four year
old, male neutered, common domestic short haired cat presented seeking
a second opinion having had an ongoing corneal lesion in its left
eye for 6 months. It was originally believed to have been a scratch
on the cornea and enucleation had been recommended due to its progressive
nature.
Examination
A full clinical
examination was undertaken along with an ophthalmic examination
as per Appendix 1. All relevant findings are recorded below.
OU: - PLR,
indirect and direct - brisk and normal
- Menace
normal
- Lids unremarkable
- Fundic
examination unremarkable
OD: - Ocular
examination unremarkable
OS: - Cornea
- a fleshy, irregular area filling the dorsolateral corneal quadrant,
with a white, gritty surface plaque. This was protuberant from the
corneal surface and extended over the limbus into the adjacent conjunctiva
which was hyperaemic. Sparse neovascularisation was present with
a rim of corneal oedema (fig. 24).
- Mild conjunctivitis
including the third eyelid
- Mild blepharospasm
with serous ocular discharge
- Fluorescein
dye retention negative.
STT L=12mm/minute,
R=14mm/minute
A corneal
scrape was taken for cytology.
Diagnosis
A diagnosis
of eosinophilic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) was made based on clinical
appearance and confirmed by cytology.
Cytology
Report (Idexx Laboratories)
A single
submitted air dried smear indicated to be from the cornea contains
a few squames and squamous epithelial cells. There are eosinophils
present. No infectious agents are seen.
Comment
- The cytological preparation is of low cellularity but the features
are consistant with slight eosinophilic inflammation. The primary
consideration should be eosiniphilic proliferative keratoconjunctivitis.
Treatment for this condition, with continued monitoring, is recommended.
Treatment
Carbomer
980 (Viscotears, Novartis AG) TID OU
Prednisolone
acetate 1% solution (Pred Forte, Allergan) QID OS
Follow
up
10 days
later - 80% resolution of the lesion (fig. 25)
- STT L=
18 mm/min, R= 19 mm/min
- Due to
the improvement in the STT values the ocular lubrication was stopped
30 days later
- The lesion
had continued to improve however there was a persistent opaque area
but this was no longer fleshy in character (fig. 26)
- STT L=19mm/min,
R=21mm/min
- The cat
was becoming intolerant to application of topical medication so
a change of medication route was necessary for 100% resolution.
- Megestrol
acetate (Ovarid, Novartis AG) started, at 2.5 mg q72hrs PO
30 days
later - 100% resolution of the corneal lesion (fig. 27).
All treatment
ceased.
Update
A minor
recurrence occurred at the same site 2 years later. This was treated
with prednisolone acetate 1% QID and resolved within 3 weeks.
Discussion
Eosinophilic
keratoconjunctivitis is a poorly understood condition that is seen
uncommonly in cats and even more rarely in horses. It has been suggested
that it may be associated with UV light exposure, being more common
in cats living at altitude (1). It has also been shown that cats
with EKC have a much higher incidence of Feline Herpes Virus (FHV-1)
(76.3%) compared with ophthalmologically normal cats (5.9%) (2).
This strongly suggests that FHV-1 is involved in the aetiology of
this condition. FHV-1 does not normally induce an eosinophilic inflammatory
response within the cornea so the pathogenesis of the condition
remains uncertain.
This is
a slowly progressive and usually unilateral disease at first but
will affect both eyes if left untreated. Initially this condition
presents as corneal oedema with neovascularisation. Signs of pain
or ocular discharge, which would usually be expected to accompany
such corneal changes, are very variable. It has a typical site of
occurrence at the dorsal temporal or dorsal nasal limbus but can
occur anywhere around the limbal circumference (3).
The granulation
tissue and white plaque lesions are usually taken to show evidence
of chronicity. The white plaques are formed from degenerate cells
and nuclear debris with amorphous eosinophilic material. There is
eosinophilic stromal infiltrate on histological examination with
a chronic granulomatous inflammatory reaction. Demonstrating eosinophils
on corneal scrape or biopsy is therefore diagnostic, especially
with the typical clinical signs (4). The histology is similar to
the lesions seen with feline eosinophilic granuloma complex however
no link has been established between skin lesions and ocular lesions.
Historically
megestrol acetate was given as a very effective treatment for this
condition but due to concerns about its safety, especially long
term, its use is now discouraged. Its use can precipitate iatrogenic
Addison's disease, pyometra and diabetes mellitus (5). Topical prednisolone
is now taken to be the treatment of choice. Megestrol acetate was
used in this case to resolve the last recalcitrant remnants of the
disease once the cat had become intolerant of topical treatment.
Megestrol acetate has the benefit of being in a very palatable base
and therefore easy to give to cats.
Recurrence
can occur, as in this case, however rapid recognition allowed early
treatment and resolution. Ongoing monitoring of these animals is
warranted to prevent establishment of a chronic lesion. Recurrence
of these lesions may help support an FHV-1 associated aetiology
as it is well documented that FHV-1 latency may occur.
References
1. Slatter
D (2001) Fundamentals of Veterinary Ophthalmology 3rd ed. WB Saunders,
288-290.
2. Nasisse
MP, Glover TL, Moore CP, Weigler BJ (1998) Detection of feline herpesvirus
1 DNA in corneas of cats with eosinophilic keratitis or corneal
sequestration. American Journal of Veterinary Research July 59 (7)
856-858.
3. Paulsen
M, Lavach JD, Severin G, Eichenbaum J (1987) Feline Eosinophilic
Keratitis: A Review of 15 Clinical Cases. Journal of the American
Animal Hospital Association 23 (63-69).
4. Prasse
KW, Winston SM (1996) Cytology and Histopathology of Feline Eosinophilic
Keratitis. Veterinary and Comparative Ophthalmology Vol. 6, No 2,
(74-81).
5. Tennant
B (1999) BSAVA Small Animal Formulary 3rd ed, BSAVA, 153.
Figure
24: On presentation.

Figure
25: Ten days into treatment.

Figure
26: Thirty days into treatment.

Figure
27: Lesion fully resolved, after sixty days of treatment.
|